Legal Opinion

Newport Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 16, 1924No. 2250PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Sulphoacid of anthraquinone, a coal-tar product, commonly known as silver salts, imported at the port of Milwaukee, Wis., was assessed with a duty of 15 per cent ad valorem and an additional duty of 2-J- cents per pound under sections 500 and 501 of the act of September 8, 1916, which in so far as pertinent, read as follows:

Sec. 500, Group II. Amidonaphthol, amidophenol * * * anthraquinone * * * or any sulphoacid or sulphoacid salt of any of the foregoing '* * * 15 per centum ad valorem.

*116Sec. 501. That on and after the day following the passage of this act, in addition to the duties provided…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Earnshaw v. CadwaladerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Shallus v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Seeberger v. Wright & Lawther Oil & Lead Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. United States v. Baker Castor Oil Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Vitelli v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peabody v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API