Legal Opinion

Marine Products Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 14, 1959No. C.D. 2080PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Merchandise invoiced and entered as canned pimientos was imported from Mexico at San Diego, Calif. Classification was claimed under the eo nomine provision for pimientos, prepared or preserved, of paragraph 775 of the Tariff Act of 1930, with duty at 6 cents per pound. The collector, however, classified the merchandise as vegetables, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, with duty under the not-specially-provided-for classification of paragraph 775 at 35 per centum ad valorem.

Five cases have been consolidated for trial. Plaintiff’s protests renew the entry claim for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. La Manna v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Austin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Peabody v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Von Bremen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Spring Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  2. Gonzalez v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API