Legal Opinion

Bunn v. City of Laredo

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1922No. 211-3309PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLENDON, P. J.

This was a suit in trespass to try title in which T. A. Bunn, plaintiff below, sought to recover of the city of Laredo, defendant below, four blocks of land within the limits of said city. The cause was tried without a jury, and judgment was rendered in favor of defendant, which judgment the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. 208 S.W. 675.

*427The controlling facts in the case are: The town of Laredo, of which defendant is the legal successor, was established hy the crown of Spain about the year 1767, at which time the Spanish government granted to the town some 10,000 acres of land for a town site.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howard Hume, Administrators, Etc. v. WindomTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Cathey v. WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Goldfrank, Frank & Co. v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. St. Louis, Hannibal & Kansas City Railway Co. v. Hannibal Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Adams v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Texas Water Rights Commission v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Dominey v. Unknown Heirs & Legal Representatives of LokomskiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Yates v. DarbyTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Benn v. Security Realty & Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Barker v. Temple Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API