Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Reading Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 18, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 19719PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., plaintiff administrator in this diversity action seeks leave to amend his Complaint after expiration of the Pennsylvania Statutes of Limitations. Defendant resists, alleging that a new claim would thereby be introduced to its prejudice.
This cause was commenced on October 20, 1955, by plaintiff administrator (hereinafter designated plaintiff), a New *188Jersey resident, against defendant railroad, a Pennsylvania corporation. Damages are sought resulting from fatal injuries to the decedent, Wilton Ison,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harold l.loudenslager v. Margaret Bittinger TeepleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972