Legal Opinion

Shutt & Co. v. Andrews

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1933No. 22881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Where a contract is not in writing, but arises "out of an open account, or is a contract “not under the hand of the party sought to be charged” or arises out of an'“implied assumpsit or undertaking,” an action for a breach thereof must be brought within four years after the right of action thereon accrues. Civil Code (1910), § 4362.

*531Decided September 20, 1933. Rehearing denied September 29, 1933.

2. When a contract is not wholly in writing, but is partly in writing and partly in parol, the entire contract is considered as one in parol. 13 C. J. 246; Evans v. Shoonmaker, 2 D. C. App. 62, 71;…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. ShipleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Wood v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Miller v. SharpIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Tishbein v. PaineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jankowski v. Taylor, Bishop & LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Scott v. BattleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Fullmer v. ProctorIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Williams v. Leide AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Albert H. Spratler v. Georgla Art Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API