Legal Opinion

Wood v. Williams

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1892PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. Owen T. Beeves, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholeield

Two questions are presented by the arguments made in this case: First, is the letter set out in the third count of appellant’s declaration a contract or instrument in writing, within the meaning of section 16 of the Statute of Limitations; and second, is the replication of the fraudulent concealment of the cause of action, as pleaded, an answer to the plea of tL^e Statute of Limitations ? Both were answered in the negative by the courts below, and in our opinion they were correctly so answered.

First — Section 16 of the Statute of Limitations is: “Actions on bonds, promissory notes, bills of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ames v. MoirIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Barney v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Stevenson v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Tuller v. VoghtIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Bank of Owensboro v. Western BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Chicago Park District v. Kenroy, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Roland Riddell v. Riddell Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  3. Kerrigan v. O'MearaMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Waugh v. Guthrie Gas, Light, Fuel & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Cangemi v. Advocate South Suburban HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API