Legal Opinion

James H. Rambo, Inc. v. Jorling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, dated September 28, 1989, which, after a hearing, assessed a civil penalty against the petitioner for violation of ECL articles 25 and 71 and 6 NYCRR part 661.

*578Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The petitioner challenges the Commissioner’s determination that it constructed a bulkhead without a permit in violation of the Tidal Wetlands Act (ECL art 25). It is well…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Sarkisian Bros. v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Grossman v. RankinNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. MATTER OF AM. TRANSIT INS. CO. v. CorcoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ross v. New York State Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Steck v. JorlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Mott v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Carlson Associates v. JorlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Russo v. JorlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API