Legal Opinion

Keenan v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 24, 1996No. 94-C-11097; CA A84950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. ORS 34.680(1). We reverse.

Plaintiff, an inmate at Oregon State Penitentiary (OSP), petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he suffers from severe headaches, jaw aches and migraines stemming from Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction (TMJ), and that he has a severe overbite that causes his teeth to grind and chip off. He claimed that ineffective treatment of his symptoms and refusal to authorize corrective surgery was a denial of constitutionally adequate dental care.

The trial court issued a writ of habeas corpus, ORS…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bedell v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. McClintock v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Billings v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Andrews v. R.W. Hays Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Villarreal v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Dunn v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Keenan v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API