Legal Opinion
McKenzie v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided April 26, 2005No. S05A0298PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENHAM, Justice.
After the trial court denied demurrers challenging the constitutionality of the statute appellant Anthony McKenzie was alleged to have violated, appellant stipulated to the evidence and was convicted in a bench trial of twice violating OCGA § 46-5-21 (a) (1) as a result of two phone calls he made in June/July 2003. Each of the counts of the accusation on which McKenzie was tried alleged he “did make a phone call. . . with conversations containing obscene, lewd, lascivious, filth[y], and indecent comments, requests, suggestions and/or proposals. . . .” OCGA § 46-5-21 (a) (1)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Grady v. UNIFIED GOV'T OF ATHENS-CLARKESupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Final Exit Network, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- WILLIAMS, CONGRESSWOMAN v. POWELLSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
- Briggs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Briggs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.