Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
The issue before us is the constitutionality of § 223(b) of the Communications Act of 1934. 47 U. S. C. § 223(b) (1982 ed., Supp. V). The statute, as amended in 1988, imposes an outright ban on indecent as well as obscene interstate commercial telephone messages. The District Court upheld the prohibition against obscene interstate telephone communications for commercial purposes, but enjoined the enforcement of the statute insofar as it applied to indecent messages. We affirm the District Court in both respects.
HH
In 1983, Sable Communications, Inc., a Los Angeles-based affiliate of Carlin…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by569 opinions
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
564 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.