Burkett v. Bayes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Lincotn County J Charles B. Wilson. Jr., Judge. Action for injunction by J. H. Bayes against George E. Burkett. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUMMONS, C.
We have not been favored with a brief on behalf of defendant in error in this ease, and we might reverse the judgment and remand the cause for new trial under rule 7, but an examination of the brief of plaintiff in error and of the record leads us to the conclusion that the judgment of the trial court was erroneous upon the evidence, and that this cause should be determined upon its merits. The parties will be herein designated as they appeared in the court below.
The plaintiff, Bayes, commenced an action in the district court against the defendant, Burkett, to recover…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garrett v. HaworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Smith v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Baker v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Martin v. British American Oil Producing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940