Legal Opinion

Smith v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1946No. 32176PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs and defendants in error defendants in the trial court, and here inafter they will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants, respectively.

This controversy is over use of waters of Wolf Creek, which flows through lands owned by defendants T. N. Delbridge and Walter Delbridge onto and through lands owned by plaintiff Georgia Smith of which Jess L. Wickett, her coplaintiff, is tenant.

Defendant Stanolind Oil & Gas Company, under a lease contract with defendants Delbridge, erected a dam on the creek on their premises and pumped water therefrom to be used in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Lessee of HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Crawford Co. v. HathawayNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Williams v. AltnowOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. In Re Rights to Use of Waters of Silvies RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. West Edmond Salt Water Disposal Ass'n v. RosecransSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Franco-American Charolaise, Ltd. v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Baker v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Nunn v. OsborneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API