Legal Opinion

Knott v. Swannell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Kankakee county; the Hon. 1ST. J. Pillsbuby, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

This was assumpsit, by appellee against appellants, on a promissory note, of which this is a copy:

“ Kankakee, April 1, 1873.

Thirty days after date I promise to pay to the order of Win. G. Swannell one thousand dollars, with ten per cent per annupi after date, value received.

(Signed) C. W. Knott,

Daniel T. Van Meter.”

Judgment by default was rendered against appellants for $1347.50.

The clerk’s transcript of the record shows that a motion for a new trial was made and overruled, but this is not embodied in a bill of exceptions, and can not, therefore, be considered.

The only objections urged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kern v. StrasbergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Wilson v. McDowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Helmuth v. BellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  2. Lanyon v. Michigan Buggy Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  3. Harris v. DicksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1882
  4. In re WatsonDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1882
  5. Rose v. Arch Rock Camp, Modern Woodmen of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API