Legal Opinion

In re Watson

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided December 1, 1882Published

On Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

Wkeeleb, T.

The Revised Laws of the state of Vermont define who shall be deemed a peddler, and provide that “no person shall be deemed a peddler by reason of selling articles of goods, wares, or merchandise, which are the manufacture of the state, except plated or gilded wares, jewelry, clocks, and watches;” that no person shall be licensed as a peddler who has not resided in the state one year next preceding the application for a license; what the license fees shall be; and that a person who becomes a peddler without a license in force shall forfeit not more than $300, nor less than $50.…

2Cases cited344 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  5. Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

339 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API