Ornelas v. Scoa Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHMOND, Chief Judge.
This appeal presents the following question: is the timely filing of a charge with the Arizona Civil Rights Division a jurisdictional prerequisite to a suit based on employment discrimination? The lower court ruled that it was and granted appellee’s motion to dismiss appellant’s claim for relief under the Arizona Civil Rights Act. A.R.S. § 1401, et seq. We agree with the trial court and affirm.
Subsection A of A.R.S. § 41-1481 provides in pertinent part:
A charge under this section shall be filed within one hundred and eighty days after the alleged unlawful…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mrs. Roger McMillan REEB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY ATLANTA, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Mary GREENE, Appellant, v. CARTER CARBURETOR CO., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Stevenson v. International Paper Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Evelyn Bodett, Wife David Bodett, Husband v. Coxcom, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Madden-Tyler v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Peterson v. SurpriseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Bailey-Null v. ValueOptionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Dawson v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.