Bailey-Null v. ValueOptions
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWANN, Judge.
¶ 1 Plaintiff Mikayla Bailey-Null (“Bailey-Null”) complains of services she received from ValueOptions, a state contractor engaged to provide behavioral health services to the public. We are asked to decide whether she was required to exhaust administrative remedies with the Arizona Department of Health Service’s Behavioral Health Division before seeking judicial remedies for civil claims based on the Arizona Adult Protective Services Act, the Arizonans with Disabilities Act, common law assault and battery, and medical malpractice. We hold that the exhaustion of remedies…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Swichtenberg v. BrimerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Campbell v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Estate of McGill Ex Rel. McGill v. AlbrechtArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Qwest Corp. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arizona Ass'n of Providers for Persons with Disabilities v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Hogan v. Washington Mutual Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF PROVIDERS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Hintze v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014