Legal Opinion

Haga v. Childress

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 1979No. 7821SC1077PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment for defendant-lessor. We hold that he did.

Upon a motion for summary judgment, the moving party bears the burden of establishing that there is no genuine issue of material fact remaining for determination, and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Savings & Loan Assoc. v. Trust Co., 282 N.C. 44, 191 S.E. 2d 683 (1972).

*305Plaintiff’s right of recovery in this action depends upon the existence of some duty of care owed to her by defendant. The general rule governing a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Rhoades v. SeidelMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Fields v. . OgburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Parrish v. WittMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hudson v. Singleton Silk Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lenz v. Ridgewood AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API