Legal Opinion

State v. Stanley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1984No. 209A83PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Attorneys for the defendant have raised seventeen issues on appeal, based on twenty-two assignments of error. We have examined the entire record on appeal. For reasons which follow, we find that this defendant received a fair trial, free of prejudicial error.

In this opinion, assignments of error will be grouped together where clarity dictates; further facts in the case will be related as relevant issues are considered.

Defendant’s first two assignments of error concern the following decision and comments by Judge Thornburg immediately after the jury had been impaneled, just…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. State v. GaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. HigginbottomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API