Legal Opinion

O'Keefe v. Weber

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1886PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Multnomah County. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion

[Filed Oct. 28, 1886, on rehearing.]

Lord, C. J.,

Concurring.—The opinion of the court, as delivered by the chief justice, in effect holds and decides that a statute may include both civil and penal provisions, and that section 3 of the act in question is not penal, but remedial. Nor do we understand that the correctness of the law as applied is impugned or denied. It is only claimed that one point *58suggested at the former hearing, and which seems to be regarded as of vital importance, has been overlooked. This is, that the title of the act does not indicate the subject matter of the statute as…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Ex parte HoweOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. State v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Calder v. OrrOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Edwards v. Superior Court, in & for the Cty. of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API