State v. Banks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
Appellants contend, first that the trial court erred in refusing to allow their motions, aptly made, for judgment as of nonsuit.
Considering the evidence, shown in the record of case on appeal, in the light most favorable to the State, as is done when testing the sufficiency thereof to withstand the challenge of demurrer thereto, this Court is of opinion and holds that the evidence is sufficient to take the case to the jury as to each defendant, and to support a conviction as to each of them on the charge under which they stand indicted. Hence the exceptions to denial of their motion for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. DutchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- State v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.