Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 14, 1976No. 61PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Our decision upon defendant Scott’s petition for further discretionary review is to reverse the Court of Appeals insofar as it affirmed the denial of this defendant’s motion for nonsuit. *714Upon the State’s appeal we affirm the Court of Appeals’ award of a new trial to defendant Jacobs.

The evidence for the State, neither defendant having offered evidence, may be summarized as follows:

Eula Mae Jacobs and Wallace Jacobs apparently did not have a peaceful marriage. On occasion he had beaten her. A week before the killing she had taken out a warrant against him. Many times in the past…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. Jarrell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. State v. HargettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. DollarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API