Blackstock v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
The intervention, in substance, alleges a suit for payment of salary, funds paid out by a confidential clerk in the running of the business, less the value of a small farm and other items received by him from the business; and that his actions were ratified by the surviving partner or partners and/or their representatives or heirs of the deceased partner or partners. Litigation involving the business began October 18, 1956 (Murphy v. Murphy, 214 Ga. 602, supra). The services of the intervenor for which he seeks pay began January 1, 1955, and ended February 28, 1957, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mobley v. Murray CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Coney v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Thornton v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Higginbotham v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Troutman v. Southern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1968