Legal Opinion

Higginbotham v. Adams

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 16, 1941No. 13738PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

The first question encountered is whether the petitioner as a legatee has the right to maintain this action against a third person. The general rule on this subject is that creditors and heirs may sue third persons only in the name of the representative of the estate. Code, § 113-1512; Hardwick v. Thomas, 10 Ga. 266; Worthy v. Johnson, 8 Ga. 236 (2) (52 Am. D. 399); Edwards v. Kilpatrick, 70 Ga. 328; 21 Am. Jur. 940, § 1003. It is also the law, that, in the absence of fraud and collusion between the executor and a creditor, a judgment regularly rendered in a court of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Worthy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
  2. Hamilton v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Smith v. CuylerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Morris v. Murphey & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Home Mixture Guano Co. v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. C & S Land, Transportation & Development Corp. v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Forrester v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Adams v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. McCommons v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API