Higginbotham v. Adams
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
The first question encountered is whether the petitioner as a legatee has the right to maintain this action against a third person. The general rule on this subject is that creditors and heirs may sue third persons only in the name of the representative of the estate. Code, § 113-1512; Hardwick v. Thomas, 10 Ga. 266; Worthy v. Johnson, 8 Ga. 236 (2) (52 Am. D. 399); Edwards v. Kilpatrick, 70 Ga. 328; 21 Am. Jur. 940, § 1003. It is also the law, that, in the absence of fraud and collusion between the executor and a creditor, a judgment regularly rendered in a court of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Worthy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
- Hamilton v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Smith v. CuylerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Morris v. Murphey & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Home Mixture Guano Co. v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- C & S Land, Transportation & Development Corp. v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Forrester v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Adams v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- McCommons v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.