Purdy v. Deere & Co.

This is an action for products liability and negligence that previously was before us. Purdy v. Deere and Company, 252 Or App 635, 287 P3d 1281 (2012) (Purdy I). We affirmed, concluding that one of plaintiffs 10 assignments of error lacked merit, and that, as to the remaining nine, the parties’ use of a general verdict form made it impossible to know whether any of the alleged errors substantially affected plaintiffs rights, as required by ORS 19.415 as a predicate for reversal. In so doing, we relied primarily on Lyons v. Walsh & Sons Trucking Co., Ltd., 337 Or 319, 96 P3d 1215 (2004). Purdy…