Legal Opinion
In Re Smith
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 14, 1990No. 19-11088PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
On November 18, 1989, the date of a final continued hearing on confirmation of the Debtor’s Chapter 13 Plan of Reorganization and Objections to the Proofs of Claim of the Internal Revenue Service (hereinafter “the IRS”), Ronald J. Harper, Esquire (hereinafter “Harper”), the Debt- or’s counsel, suddenly moved to dismiss the entire underlying Chapter 13 case. Although recognizing that the Debtors had an absolute right to have their case dismissed under 11 U.S.C. § 1307(b), counsel for the IRS, having spent numerous hours in preparation for the contest…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lloyd Lieb, Trading as Specialized Cassettes v. Topstone Industries, Inc., and D. Robbins & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Albert J. Gaiardo and Patricia Gaiardo, His Wife v. Ethyl Corporation, A/K/A Ethyl Corporation, Visqueen DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Mary Ann Pensiero, Inc. v. LingleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Dura Systems, Inc., a Pennsylvania Business Corporation, in 89-3005 v. Rothbury Investments, Ltd., a Canadian Corporation, in 89-3023Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re International Mobile Advertising Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Liebersohn v. Zisholtz (In Re Martin's Aquarium, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- In Re GrigsbyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1999
- Keister v. PPL Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- In Re PearsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.