Legal Opinion

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Richardson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 17, 1922No. 3876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, J. H. Richardson, recovered judgment against the Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, defendant, for personal injuries sustained while plaintiff was employed by defendant in the capacity of a lineman, and while he was engaged with a number of other workmen in dismantling telephone lines in the city of Atlanta.

The defendant had employed in this work, at the time the plaintiff was injured, 15 or 20 crews. There was a foreman of each crew. The foreman of plaintiffs crew was one Garner, the foreman of another crew was one Chaffin, and these two crews…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Dublin Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Alaska Treadwell Gold Min. Co. v. WhelanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. McDonald v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blum-O'Neill Co. v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  2. United States v. MartinezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API