United States v. Martinez

OdliN, Judge,

delivered tbe following opinion:

Tbe question presented for decision at this time in tbe above-entitled case is whether tbe second amended motion filed by tbe counsel for the defendant for tbe return of certain liquors should be granted or denied. Tbe verified statements by tbe defendant, and which have not' been refuted by tbe United States, set forth that tbe liquors in question were seized on or about January 25, 1922, from certain premises in tbe city of Caguas,. Porto Rico, not owned by tbe defendant, but which were occupied by him as bis private dwelling.

*260Under tbe rulings of…