Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Caudill, Rowlett, Scott & Board of Education, Union Free School, District No. 3
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 11, 1975PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 5, 1974 denying petitioner’s application to stay arbitration unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter remanded for a hearing on the issue of Statute of Limitations. While pursuant to New York -law the court must decide whether claims sought to be arbitrated are barred by limitations of time (Matter of Schlaifer v. Kaiser, 46 A D 2d 850; Matter of Andresen & Co. v. Shepard, 45 A D 2d 578), where the matter is subject to the provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act (U. S. Code, tit. 9, § 1 et seq.),…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Harrisons & Crosfield, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Laudadio v. White Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Paver & Wildfoerster & Catholic High School Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re the Arbitration between Cone Mills Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In re the Arbitration between Buck Creek Industries, Inc. & Beattie Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1978
- Milliken & Co. v. Tiffany Loungewear, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.