Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Buck Creek Industries, Inc. & Beattie Manufacturing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bentley Kassal, J.

This is an application by petitioner for an order, pursuant to CPLR 7502 (subd [b]), staying arbitration of claims arising out of contracts, dating from September 15, 1975 to September 16, 1976, on the ground that such claims are barred by a contractual limitation of time and that those claims may not be presented by the respondent in the pending arbitration as a claim or offset.

Initially the following undisputed facts should be noted:

*813Petitioner is a manufacturer of carpet yarn having its principal offices in Atlanta, Georgia, and plants in Georgia,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. In re the Arbitration between Rederi & Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. In re the Arbitration between Caudill, Rowlett, Scott & Board of Education, Union Free School, District No. 3Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. ShaddockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. Painewebber Incorporated v. Michael J. Bybyk and Joyce O. BybykCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. Painewebber Incorporated v. Michael J. Bybyk and Joyce O. BybykCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API