Dee-K Enterprises, Inc. v. Heveafil Sdn. Bhd.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
In this international antitrust action, plaintiffs allege a conspiracy between and among various foreign manufacturers of extruded rubber thread and their distributors to fix prices of the thread in the United States. The underlying facts are set out in full in an earlier Memorandum Opinion in this matter. See Dee-K Enterps., Inc. v. Heveafil Sdn. Bhd., 982 F.Supp. 1138 (E.D.Va.1997).
The matter now before the Court is a motion by several defendants to dismiss for improper venue pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3), Fed.R.Civ.P. The facts pertinent to this motion…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers National Fund v. Baylor Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
- Gates Learjet Corp. v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Nichols v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Affinity Memory & Micro, Inc. v. K & Q Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Corry v. CFM Majestic Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Seretse-Khama v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Hall v. Tyco International Ltd.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Wafra Leasing Corp. 1999-A-1 v. Prime Capital Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.