Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Karpinos

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 15, 1995No. 9315SC1316PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

This appeal involves defendants Chapel Hill, Karpinos, Gold, Snipes, Wiseman, Gale, and McCall. Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in dismissing their claims against these defendants.

I. 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Plaintiffs’ first cause of action is grounded in section 1983, under which they seek compensatory and punitive damages, as well as equitable relief. They alleged officers used unreasonable and excessive force in executing the search warrant, and that defendants detained them without a valid warrant, probable cause, or reasonable suspicion, all in violation of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Price v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Rousselo v. StarlingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Lorbacher v. Housing Authority of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Armstrong v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
  5. Staley v. LingerfeltCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API