Demontiney v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiffs breach of contract complaint, stating that the plaintiff “has not and cannot allege that it is a party to any contract with the United States and has provided no other sufficient basis for this Court’s jurisdiction.” Plaintiff, however, contends that, “based upon the actual contract documents and their implementation, there was privity between the Plaintiff engineer and the Defendant BIA,” so that a contractual relationship did exist between the United States and the plaintiff. Plaintiff relies on this asserted contractual…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ronald Colbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Boye v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Riviera Drilling & Exploration Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Gilbert v. WeahkeeDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
- Silver State Land LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021