Legal Opinion

Dittimus-Bey v. Taylor

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 31, 2007No. Civil Action No. 05-0063 (JBS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMANDLE, District Judge.

This matter comes before Court on a motion for class certification, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(2). For the reasons stated in this Opinion, the Court shall grant the motion and certify a class of all individuals incarcerated at the Camden County Correctional Facility, either as pretrial detainees or as convicted prisoners, from the inception of this lawsuit on January 6, 2005 until its termination.1

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, who initially filed this action pro se, allege that severe overcrowding at the Camden County Correctional…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Kerrigan v. Philadelphia Board of ElectionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Lyon v. U.S. Immigration & Customs EnforcementDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  4. BETHUNE v. OWENSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
  5. DEMBY v. COUNTY OF CAMDENDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API