Legal Opinion

In Re Jones

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 18, 2010No. 09-1858PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Curtis Jones is a Michigan prisoner serving a life sentence for second-degree murder. He has moved the court for authorization to file a second or successive habeas petition raising two claims: (1) that changes to Michigan’s parole system since his conviction constitute an unconstitutional ex post facto law, and (2) that the jury at his trial was not drawn from a fair cross-section of the community. Because we conclude that the ex post facto claim may proceed without our authorization, we dismiss the motion as unnecessary with respect to that claim. We deny the motion as it pertains to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Panetti v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. In re WogenstahlCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Robert HairstonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  3. In re Raymond TibbettsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Khaled ObeidCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Danny HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API