Legal Opinion
In re Raymond Tibbetts
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 24, 2017No. 17-3609PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Petitioner Raymond Tibbetts, .filed a petition for. a writ, of habeas corpus, which the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio determined was a second-or-successive habeas petition and transferred to our court. The district'court properly concluded that Tibbetts’s petition is second or successive, and Tibbetts’s motion to remand is therefore DENIED. Because Tibbetts filed a second-or-successive habeas petition and cannot meet the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b), his ha-beas petition is DISMISSED.
On August 27, 1998, Tibbetts was convicted of one count of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Panetti v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Magwood v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- In re: Douglas ColeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- In re WogenstahlCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Danny HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- In re CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.