Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 29, 1989No. 2-85-239-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

KELTNER, Justice.

The primary issue in this case is whether the trial court’s erroneous admission of a videotape of the complaining witness, prepared out of the presence of the defendant, *955was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We also must consider whether the court’s erroneous charge on good time and parole was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

We hold both errors are harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and affirm the trial court’s conviction.

This case reaches us on remand from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Previously, Freddie Lee Clark appealed his conviction by a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Cobarrubio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Carlock v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  3. Roger Lee Carlock v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  4. in the Matter of A. W., a Juvenile, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API