Carlock v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice ROSS.
Roger Lee Carlock was charged with indecency with a child. He pled not guilty and not true to two paragraphs alleged for enhancement of punishment. A jury found him guilty of the offense charged and also found the two enhancement paragraphs true. He was sentenced, in accordance with the jury’s verdict, to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment and a $10,000.00 fine.
Carlock alleges the trial court erred: 1) by denying his request to make an opening statement after the State read the indictment in front of the jury, thereby presenting the equivalent of an opening…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mallory v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Parra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
- Ex Parte GirnusCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Mallory v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Reynolds v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
- Carlock v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- Dejesus Fobbs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
- Dexter Alexander v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- Gilberto Tamayo Villarreal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.