Legal Opinion

Carlock v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided February 5, 2003No. 06-02-00099-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice ROSS.

Roger Lee Carlock was charged with indecency with a child. He pled not guilty and not true to two paragraphs alleged for enhancement of punishment. A jury found him guilty of the offense charged and also found the two enhancement paragraphs true. He was sentenced, in accordance with the jury’s verdict, to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment and a $10,000.00 fine.

Carlock alleges the trial court erred: 1) by denying his request to make an opening statement after the State read the indictment in front of the jury, thereby presenting the equivalent of an opening…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mallory v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Parra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
  4. Ex Parte GirnusCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Mallory v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  2. Carlock v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  3. Dejesus Fobbs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
  4. Dexter Alexander v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  5. Gilberto Tamayo Villarreal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API