Legal Opinion
Southern Rehabilitation Group v. Sebelius
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided July 2, 2012No. 2:09-CV-226PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
J. RONNIE GREER, District Judge.
On May 21, 2012, the Court provided the parties notice that it intended to convert defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint in Part into a Motion for Summary Judgment. [Doc. 63]. A copy of the Proposed Order was attached to this notice. [Doc. 63-1]. Plaintiffs were given fourteen (14) days to show cause why summary judgment was not warranted and to provide evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact. Plaintiffs timely responded by filing a brief and requesting oral argument,1 but submitted no additional evidence. [Doc. 64]. Defendants…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Southern Rehabilitation Group, P.L.L.C. v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Southern Rehabilitation Group, P.L.L.C. v. BurwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017