Legal Opinion

In Re U.S. Silica Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 2005No. 04-0270PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Ten silicosis cases involving hundreds of plaintiffs were filed in Cameron County and randomly assigned to six different courts. At the behest of different parties, three judges issued conflicting orders asserting jurisdiction over cases in their own courts or others. Because the Cameron County local rales permit a unilateral transfer only by the court where the first case was filed, we conditionally grant a writ of mandamus directing the others to vacate orders forbidding that transfer.

On May 30, 2003, a single attorney filed ten silicosis lawsuits in Cameron County. The allegations in each…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. CSR LTD. v. LinkTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In Re BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Abor v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Mapco, Inc. v. ForrestTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Curtis v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. ReadTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re Energy Transfer Fuel, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2009
  3. In Re City of Coppell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  4. Artemio Orlando Sanchez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  5. In Re Energy Transfer Fuel, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API