Turnbull v. Prentiss Lumber Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Alpena. (Ernerick, J.) Creditor’s bill. Defendants Churchill, Prentiss, Reid and Billings appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
On the 21st of February, 1884, complainant filed a bill of complaint against defendants, alleging therein that he is a creditor of the Prentiss Lumber Company, a corporation organized under Act 187 of the Session Laws of 1875, by filing articles of association on the 20th of March, 1882; that defendants Prentiss, Eeid and Billings were its stockholders and first directors; that soon after their formation the corporation became the owner of certain real estate, and also a large amount of other property connected with its business; that it carried on its business up to or about September 7,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bloodgood v. ClarkNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- Sandford v. SinclairNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
- Fitzburgh v. EveringhamNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
- Cook v. Detroit & Milwaukee RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- West v. SwanNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lyons-Thomas Hardware Co. v. Perry Stove Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
- Bagdonas v. Liberty Land & Investment Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
- Young v. Erie Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Wabash Railroad v. DykemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- McBryan v. Universal Elevator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.