Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Felice

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1989No. 1924PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

This disciplinary matter comes before the court upon its own initiative. Rules for Lawyer Discipline (RLD) 7.1(b). The hearing panel officer recommended a reprimand and a 30-day suspension for Victor Felice's misconduct while acting as guardian of Verna Cambern. The Washington State Bar's Disciplinary Board unanimously *521recommended only a letter of censure. We hold a letter of censure and a 30-day suspension to be the appropriate sanctions.

Facts

In the early 1970's, Felice represented a Mr. Kreck in his prosecution and unsuccessful appeals for the murder of his wife. In 1979, Felice…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SeldenWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against YatesWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against AnschellWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against HuddlestonWashington Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API