In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Huddleston
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
Attorney John C. Huddleston appeals the unanimous recommendation of the Washington State Bar Association Disciplinary Board (Board) that he be disbarred for violating the Rules of Professional Conduct. Huddleston challenges not only the conclusions reached by the Board, but the findings of fact underlying these conclusions. We agree with Huddleston’s argument that the record does not support the conclusion that he committed peijury. Nevertheless, in light of Huddleston’s multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, we conclude that he should be disbarred.
I
The alleged misconduct…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- G. Elmer Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Matter of DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WhittWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against PooleWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against AnschellWashington Supreme Court · 2000
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.