Legal Opinion

Cedarburg Light & Water Commission v. Glens Falls Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1969No. 167, 168PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The rules under which this court approaches questions on summary judgment are well established and no useful purpose will be served by again restating them.

The pleadings reflect that the case is predicated upon breach of contract — the breach being the defendants’ failure to indemnify under the terms of the fire insurance contracts.

This case is not directed to recovery of litigation expenses in the present action, but to recovery of litigation expenses incurred by the plaintiff in a collateral suit against third-party wrongdoers.

As we consider this case on motion for summary judgment, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leszczynski v. SurgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Meiser v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Baker v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Jahns v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Skyline Construction, Inc. v. Sentry Realty, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Murray v. Holiday Rambler, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Watkins v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Shands v. CastrovinciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Baja Energy, Inc. v. Ball, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API