Legal Opinion

Thimgan v. Mathews

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 1, 1923No. 10,529PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Thimgan brought suit against defendants in error to quiet title to land. He was defeated and brings error. He claimed as survivor in a joint tenancy with one Elgin Peer, and defendants claimed as said Elgin Peer’s heirs. Thimgan also claimed part of the estate as heir of said Peer’s mother— one Esther Pheba Albertie Young, who Thimgan claimed was his common law wife.

There is nothing in the claim of common law marriage. They lived as the witnesses say “as husband and wife” but it is evident that this expression is used as a euphemism for sexual relation, and not in the sense of claiming to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peters v. PetersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  2. Employer's Mutual Insurance v. MorgulskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  3. Peery v. PeeryColorado Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Cordas v. RyanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  5. Brewer v. Brewer's EstateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. LuceroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Foley v. GavinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Walker v. DrogmundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  4. Conter v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API