Peery v. Peery
Colorado Court of Appeals
Error to Denver District Court. Hon. JOHN H. Denison, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, P. J.
Defendant in error, to whom we shall hereafter refer as plaintiff, brought her aetion for divorce and alimony and had judgment. She admits that no marriage ceremony was ever performed or attempted, hence she relies entirely upon what is known as a common law marriage. The record discloses that the alleged agreement of the parties to become husband and wife took place, if at all, at a time when,,by virtue of a statutory marriage, plaintiff was the wife of one John Gordon. Thereafter plaintiff obtained a divorce from Gordon, but no new contract was ever entéred into between plaintiff and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estate of Klipfel v. KlipfelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Davidson v. Unknown Heirs of PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Weidenhoft v. PrimmWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
- Henry v. McNealeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
- In re Rossignot's WillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1905
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. LuceroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Welch v. All PersonsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Employer's Mutual Insurance v. MorgulskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- In Re Estate of BiviansNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Cordas v. RyanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.