Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 25, 2004No. AC 24021PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WEST, J.

The petitioner, Daniel Bernstein, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The underlying issue is whether the petitioner was denied full use of his *79presentence confinement credit as applied to concurrent sentences that were imposed on different dates.1 For the reasons set forth, we affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the petitioner’s appeal. The petitioner came into the custody of the respondent, the commissioner of correction, on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Payton v. AlbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Valle v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. Valle v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. King v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Washington v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Anderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  4. Bernstein v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Bernstein v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API