Legal Opinion

Stocker & Sitler, Inc. v. Metzger

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1969No. 986PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRutherford, J.

This appeal is from a declaratory judgment rendered by the Common Pleas Court construing an exception contained in the granting clause of premises conveyed by deed.

On October 30, 1914, by deed recorded in Volume 173, page 489, Tuscarawas County Deed Records, William R. Metzger and Ida C. Metzger conveyed to Richard Montague and Catherine Montague the premises in question, excepting such portion as was reserved by the following portion of the granting clause contained in the same paragraph as the description of the premises granted:

“Excepting there is reserved unto said grantors, all the veins…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dunham & Shortt v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  2. Atwood v. RodmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Silver v. BushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Bundy v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. New Mexico and Arizona Land Company v. ElkinsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Blair Riggs v. Island Creek Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  2. Marysville Newspapers v. Delaware Gazette Co., 14-06-34 (8-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Bath Township v. Raymond C. Firestone, Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Wiseman v. Cambria Products Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Mid Ohio Coal Co. v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API