Legal Opinion

Bundy v. Myers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 13, 1953No. Appeal, 180PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The plaintiff is the successor in title to the grantee of certain realty under a deed of 1884. The defendant Myers is successor in title to the grantor in the same deed which contained the following reservation: “Excepting and reserving, out of this land, the oil, coal, fire clay and minerals of every kind and character with rights of entry for the purpose of removal of the same . . . .” Myers leased to defendant Rupert the rights so reserved. Rupert entered upon the land, drilled a -well and obtained natural gas. The plaintiff, claiming that gas was not embraced…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dunham & Shortt v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  2. Silver v. BushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Klaer v. RidgwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
  4. Sheffield Water Co. v. Elk Tanning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Wilson v. A. Cook Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wilkes-Barre Township School District v. CorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. New Charter Coal Co. v. McKeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Highland v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Heidt v. Aughenbaugh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Butler v. Charles Powers Estate ex rel. WarrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API