Legal Opinion

New Mexico and Arizona Land Company v. Elkins

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided February 6, 1956No. Civ. 3010PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, District Judge.

The question presented on the motion for a summary judgment filed by plaintiffs herein, is whether the clause “all oil, gas and minerals underlying or appurtenant to said lands”, in a reservation contained in a deed to property conveyed by plaintiffs, and eventually purchased by defendants, includes and covers uranium, thorium and associated mineral bearing ores in and under all of the lands described in the deeds.

The instant case was filed in this court on the grounds of diversity of citizenship, and the fact that the amount involved is claimed to exceed the sum of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson & Kerr Drilling Co. v. BruhlmeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Missouri Pac. Rd., Thompson, Trustee v. StrohackerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Otto v. FieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Puget Mill Co. v. DuecyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Gibson v. SellarsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Acker v. GuinnTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Cain v. NeumannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Spurlock v. Santa Fe Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Storm Associates, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Amoco Production Co. v. Guild TrustDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API