Legal Opinion
Ischay v. Barnhart
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 27, 2005No. ED CV 04-1696-PJWPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WALSH, United States Magistrate Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) seeking reversal of the decision by Defendant Social Security Administration (“Agency”) denying Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. Alternatively, he asks the Court to remand the case to the Agency for further proceedings. For the reasons discussed below, the Agency’s decision is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for the award of benefits.
II
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff was born on February 2, 1934, and was 69 years old at the time of the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Bradley v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Thompson v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Calderon v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Samples v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Pronti v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.